We used ESPN’s NFL Playoff Equipment to produce the absolute most unlikely 2019 playoff segment

For football supporters, the annual unveiling of ESPN’s playoff machine is just as much of a vacation as Christmas or Thanksgiving.

The simulation allows people to select winners and losers of the regular season’s outstanding activities and churns out a projected playoff segment predicated on win-loss documents and tiebreakers.

Joe Musgrove walks through the nerves he thought throwing a no-hitter earlier this year | Flippin’ Bats

It’s an incredibly helpful software for media and supporters, but it’s in the same way engaging to toy with the machine to see what kind of goofy effects it may produce. Therefore that’s exactly what we did. The goal was easy: create the absolute most statistically unlikely playoff segment possible.

MORE NFL WEEK 12:

Picks contrary to the spread | Energy rankings

The very first get of organization is searching for a way to squeeze as much 2020 No. 1 draft select challengers in to the playoffs. In the AFC, the Bengals remain at 0-10 and the Dolphins (2-8) and Planes (3-7) can perform no a lot better than wrap the Patriots with nine benefits on the season. Not just a ton planning on here.

For the NFC, nevertheless, the door is a little more open. The Redskins, which possess a conference-worst 1-9 report, still have a mathematical chance of achieving the playoffs that season. The exact same case also pertains to the lowly Leaders (2-8), Falcons (3-7), Buccaneers (3-7) and Cardinals (3-7-1).

We started by seeking to put as much current non-playoff groups in the segment and eliminate as much correct playoff challengers as possible. These attempts resulted in the Patriots, Ravens, Chiefs, 49ers, Packers, Saints and Cowboys all missing the playoffs.

The final playoff seedings in line with the simulation are outlined below with each team’s projected playoff report and ESPN’s FiveThirtyEight playoff probabilities.

(Screengrab/ESPN)

AFC

1. Browns (10-6) — Mathematically talking, Cleveland may still meet its lofty preseason expectations. Because it currently stands, however, the Browns are 4-6 and three activities behind the Chiefs in the gain order for the No. 6 seed. The fact that Cleveland may still technically area the top seed in the AFC is quite remarkable. First-round bye possibility: <1%

2. Raiders (10-6) — The Raiders, meanwhile, are trending nearer to playoff contention. Oakland is linked with the Chiefs in the loss order and has only one game against a team above .500 the remaining way, which can be Kansas Town on Dec. 1. First-round bye possibility: 2%

3. Costs (10-6) — Think about a adjusting of the protect in the AFC East? The Costs trail the Patriots by two activities but look the section of a playoff contender through the initial 10 games. The sole problem is Buffalo has yet to beat a winning staff this year and its outstanding routine characteristics the Cowboys, Ravens, Steelers and Patriots. Playoff possibility: 72%

4. Texans (9-6-1) — The AFC South could easily get quite frantic down the grow if the Texans stumble. Houston currently brings with a 7-4 report with the Colts (6-5), Leaders (5-5) and also the Jaguars (4-6) not much behind. Houston and Tennessee can meet in months 15 and 17 for a pair of matchups that figure to go a considerable ways in deciding the division. Playoff possibility: 84%

5. Jaguars (9-6-1) — Surprise, surprise. Despite falling two activities below .500 after beginning 4-4, Jacksonville isn’t finished. The Jaguars’ outstanding routine is positive, too, with four of the ultimate six activities coming against groups below .500. Playoff possibility: 7%

6. Leaders (9-6-1) — Operation AFC South Takeover is detailed with the Leaders rounding out the playoff subject, causing the Patriots, Ravens and Chiefs among potential Super Dish challengers booking early vacations. I wouldn’t bet any money on this circumstance arriving at fruition. Playoff possibility: 17%

Lacking out: Patriots (playoff miss possibility: <1%), Ravens (1%), Chiefs (8%), Colts (64%), Steelers (71%)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *